MemorySync
All comparisons

MemorySync vs Zep

An objective architectural comparison of MemorySync and Zep to help you understand the right memory infrastructure for your AI agents.

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityMemorySyncZep
Data ArchitectureEnterprise Tenant ScopingGraph-Based User Memory
LatencyOptimized for ScaleOptimized (<200ms)
Identity & AccessSAML, OIDCAvailable
ComplianceDeletion TombstonesStandard
Access ControlGranular RBACBasic
Event ArchitectureFull WebhooksLimited
Client EcosystemOfficial SDKsOfficial SDKs
ManagementFully ManagedManaged & Self-Hosted

Why teams choose MemorySync

  • Provides a highly sophisticated, temporally-aware knowledge graph that understands when facts were true.
  • Separates the concept of "Sessions" (individual conversations) from the persistent "User" memory graph.
  • Extremely low-latency semantic retrieval optimized for conversational agents.
  • Native webhook lifecycle integration for building event-driven architectures.

Moving from Zep

  1. 1

    Extract entity graphs and episodic memory from Zep.

  2. 2

    Map Zep Users to MemorySync's Tenant/Project/User hierarchy.

  3. 3

    Import the payload via MemorySync APIs.

  4. 4

    Update your application logic to utilize MemorySync SDKs.

Common questions

Is Zep strictly session-based?

No. Zep maintains a persistent, user-centric knowledge graph that synthesizes information across all of a user's individual sessions.

How does MemorySync differ architecturally from Zep?

MemorySync focuses heavily on strict B2B multi-tenant isolation and enterprise governance (tenants, projects, and RBAC), while Zep focuses heavily on complex graph relationships and temporal reasoning for individual agents.

Comparisons

Move from Zep to MemorySync

Start on the free tier and evaluate retrieval, isolation, and governance against your own workload.

Start free. No credit card required.